The Three Schools of Business Ethics

Home
>
Ethics
>
The Three Schools of Business Ethics

The Three Schools of Business Ethics

G. Richard Shell, author of Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People, identifies three primary schools of ethics in negotiation. To me, they are equally valuable in examining ethics in the context of business in general.

1. The Poker School - "It's a Game"

To poker players, business is a game and anything that can be done to gain advantage within the rules of the game (generally speaking, the laws of the land), is fair and just. If you love negotiating "gambits" (lowballing, goodcop/bad cop, red herrings, nibbling, etc.), and sales "tactics" (101 effective closing techniques, 30 tricks to getting past the gatekeeper,etc.) you may well belong to this school.

2. The Idealist School - "Do the right thing, even if it hurts."

To the idealist, there is no seperation between business in life. If you would not lie to your loved ones, you do not lie to your clients. If it's OK to tell a "white lie" to protect the feelings of a friend or prevent a tragedy, it's OK to tell a "white lie" to protect a corporate ally or prevent a business tragedy. While two idealists may differ in the specific set of rules they live by, they share the rigidity of doing what they believe to be "right", even when it seems contrary to their business goals.

3. The Pragmatist School - "What goes around, comes around."

The behaviour of a pragmatist may be inseperable from that of an idealist,but the motivation is different. While the idealist tells the truth and treats people fairly because it's "the right thing to do", the pragmatist tells the truth and treats people fairly because they believe it is the most effective way of getting things done. However, they will not hesitate to use deception as a necessary tool in pursuing their aims. Because pragmatists value their reputation (being seen to be honest), they will tend towards "misleading" statements over outright lies.

There are also combinations of these schools. "Pragmatic idealists" dothe right thing because of their ideals but are not above pushing the envelope of truth when the pressure is on and the chips are high; "pragmatic poker players" tend not to bluff in order to evolve their reputation as trustworthy, but will take advantage of that reputation when it really counts. "Idealistic poker players" are those among us who recognise business as a game, fully expect everyone around them to do their best to lie and cheat, but will only involve themselves in games they believe they can win by doing the "right" thing.

Possibly the most important thing to realise is that not everyone plays by your rules. Your being honest does not ensure others will be honest with you; similarly, your willingness to lie, cheat, and bend the rules does not mean the people you are doing with will do the same.

Here are a few things you can do to put these theories of business ethics into practice:

1. If you haven't already, identify what "school" you belong to. Remember,your motivation is as important an indication of your ethics as your actions.

2. Identify at least one person that you know or have read about that seems to embody each of the three primary and three secondary schools of ethics. Once again, be aware that knowing someone's actions without understanding their motivation will not necessarily reveal their ethical bent.

3. Discuss this tip with friends, and see what else you can discover that will enable you to be who you are while dealing ever-more effectively with others.

Have fun, learn heaps, and remember - a good poker player will inevitably tell you they're an idealist!

Michael Neill is a licensed Master Trainer of NLP and has written over 450 articles on in the areas of business success, money, relationships, health, happiness, well-being, and spirituality. His weekly coaching column is reprinted in newspapers and magazines throughout the world, and can be found online at http://www.geniuscatalyst.com

In The News:

ProPublica
Ethics group urges investigators to probe lobbyist involved in Owens trip
WatertownDailyTimes.com
By BRIAN AMARAL A public ethics watchdog wants federal ethics investigators to probe a lobbying firm that arranged Rep. William L. Owens's trip to Taiwan. In a letter sent Wednesday to the Office of Congressional Ethics, officials from Public Citizen ...
Owens Welcomes Ethics ProbeWWNY TV 7

all 4 news articles »

USA TODAY
Justice ethics report finds misconduct by Stevens prosecutors
Anchorage Daily News
By PETE YOST AP WASHINGTON — The Justice Department's internal ethics watchdog said Thursday that two prosecutors in the bungled corruption case against then-Sen. Ted Stevens engaged in reckless professional misconduct by failing to disclose ...
Ted Stevens Case: Justice Department Says Two Prosecutors Engaged In MisconductHuffington Post
Justice Dept. probe finds misconduct by prosecutors in Stevens trialCNN International
Justice Dep't: Misconduct by 2 in Stevens caseWBRC

all 249 news articles »

McKenna faces 2 ethics complaints over county work
The Seattle Times
A lawyer and a citizen have each filed ethics complaints against Republican gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna. The Associated Press Note to Kyle Olive and Kimberly Christensen (and the note would be the same regardless... (May 24, 2012, by Creasy ...
McKenna faces ethics complaint over county workThe Columbian

all 22 news articles »

Man leading ethics probe of Baptist leader resigns
The Daily Advance
(AP) — The head of a group investigating the comments of Southern Baptist Convention ethics leader Richard Land has resigned. Arkansas pastor Richard Piles said he has taken over as Trustee Board chairman for the Ethics and Religious Liberty ...
Southern Baptist committee head resigns in Richard Land ethics caseThe Tennessean
Investigation re: Baptist spokesman's commentsOneNewsNow

all 67 news articles »

Board Dismisses Ethics Complaint Against Two Aldermen
Patch.com
There is no conflict of interest by members of the Common Council also serving on the Waukesha County Board of Supervisors, Ethics Board rules. By Sarah Millard Alderwoman Kathleen Cummings, sitting, listens to the Ethics Board discuss a complaint ...

and more »

The Guardian
News Summary: News Corp. lobbyist testifies on UK government contacts to ...
Washington Post
ETHICS PANEL: Lobbyist Fred Michel talked Thursday to the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics that the British government created because of the hacking scandal. Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published ...
British Inquiry Questions Murdoch LobbyistNew York Times
Adviser pulls Cameron into storm over HuntFinancial Times
British PM David Cameron appointed 'known Murdoch supporter'The Australian
Huffington Post -Ventura County Star
all 1,273 news articles »

Ex-SEC Attorney Barred for 1 Year Over Stanford Ethics Lapse
BusinessWeek
Spencer Barasch, who participated in the SEC's investigation of R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, performed private legal work for Stanford Group Co. about a year after leaving the agency even though its ethics office had told him he was ...
SEC sanctions ex-staffer who represented Stanford CoReuters
SEC Bars Former SEC Employee On Alleged Conflict Of InterestWall Street Journal

all 4 news articles »

Essex County Ethics board reprimands Keene super
Plattsburgh Press Republican
ELIZABETHTOWN — The Essex County Ethics Committee issued a decision reprimanding Keene's supervisor for using town gas. Its findings came Thursday after a six-week review, saying the committee believes Bill Ferebee's use of 14 gallons from the town ...

Ethics should guide Vanderbilt investments
The Tennessean
Thousands more participated in the movement for ethical investment by producing, showing and sharing media, and hosting dozens of teach-ins including a march on the Board of Trust in November and a teach-in with more than 50 faculty and students at the ...

and more »

Boynton expense fund is an ethics risk, county says
Sun-Sentinel
A Palm Beach County ethics officer said recently that restrictions on the reimbursement funds are ambiguous and elected officials don't have to report how they spend it. And while nothing requires them to return extra money, keeping it would be a ...

and more »

Google News